Capital markets IT
An incredible growth
In the last 20 years, the very strong growth on capital market has triggered huge investments. For some companies strategy was pretty straightforward: any product, anywhere! Focus was definitely on growth and not on costs. The priority was to grab new market shares and revenues not to save cost or improve efficiency.The direct consequence of this strategy has been a huge size increase as shown in the
following graph:
Management capacity had to grow accordingly
This growth has not been possible without increasing management capacity. Going on with the Goldman Sachs example, if we consider that a team is composed of an average of 6 teammates, the growth in the graph above correspond to an increase of more than half a hierarchical level!As experienced managers were not so common within Capital Markets IT, a lot of experienced managers, able to structure teams to sustain this growth have been coming from other industries or even other areas than IT.
Since the crisis, innovation and revenues race is over
The financial crisis is bringing a new situation: growth race is over, cost is the main focus. This is forcing the financial industry to move back cutting costs and jobs. This is where the main challenge is: how to scale down regaining efficiency? Will the managers that have been managing the scale up be able to manage the scale down?
This deep transformation is very difficult to trigger and is coming from top management which, seeing smaller or new competitors entering in the market, may realize that a deep transformation is mandatory. This transformation means cutting hierarchical levels building smaller teams, more agile and more efficient.
Processes need also to be revised to be adapted to the new size, internal invoicing for example does not need the same effort for a smaller setup!
The most challenging part is not to cut cost at the same efficiency but is to improve efficiency while cutting costs. This means for IT identifying and retaining the best profiles that are making a true difference and setting up with those profiles small and agile teams. One can understand how different this approach is from the past, where quantity was more in focus than quality.
Processes need also to be revised to be adapted to the new size, internal invoicing for example does not need the same effort for a smaller setup!
The most challenging part is not to cut cost at the same efficiency but is to improve efficiency while cutting costs. This means for IT identifying and retaining the best profiles that are making a true difference and setting up with those profiles small and agile teams. One can understand how different this approach is from the past, where quantity was more in focus than quality.